I've cut out the "Explaining myself"
And I've also cut out the part:
- The Original Officer advised me to seek my GP to email him, instead of asking me to deal with the Review Team directly – which would have saved me time and energy.
- I was confused as to what was meant by "I am not the legal owner of the package". I understand now what it means within context
Reason I've cut those two main parts out where .. I did not wake up very alert and couldn't revise soberly whether the letter would be effect with my complains.
And so, while still in doubt - I opt to delete them just in case, just in case it makes things worse than better.
Note: They could make things better! But I wasn't sure at the time, so had to play "safer"
My N and N-phases brings me to be:
risk-averse: When dealing with official things
risk-seeking: When not dealing with official things
So for example, when I am talking with a friend, or even posting a message to a forum - I am not risk-averse. I act first then think later.
But when am writing a letter to an authority - I act first then delete things later.
OK .. don't know if I made any sense, but it is nice not to feel so worried now.
Am pretty sleepy though. Today am finding hard to wake up. Maybe am tired of all the chasing? The saga was energy-intensive. Again hope some good comes out of it.
Hugs to you sleepless sleeper. Hope all is OK.